Norms of evidence in the classification of living fossils

Sterner, Beckett (2023) Norms of evidence in the classification of living fossils. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11. ISSN 2296-701X

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/2/package-entries/fevo-11-1198224-r1/fevo-11-1198224.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/2/package-entries/fevo-11-1198224-r1/fevo-11-1198224.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Some species have held fast for millions of years as constants in a changing world. Often called “living fossils,” these species capture scientific and public interest by showing us the vestiges of an earlier world. If living fossils are defined by a holistic pattern of low evolutionary rates or stasis, however, then classifying a species as a living fossil involves the application of sophisticated norms of scientific evidence. Using examples from Crocodilia and the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus), I show how scientists’ evidential criteria for classifying living fossils are contentious and underspecified in many cases, threatening the concept’s explanatory interest and its adequacy for sustaining a collective problem agenda as proposed by Scott Lidgard and Alan Love. While debates over the definition of the living fossil concept may appear fruitless, I suggest they can be productive insofar as the debate leads to clarified and improved evidential standards for classification. To this end, I formulate a view of the living fossil concept as an investigative kind, and compare two theoretical frameworks as a basis for shared evidential norms: the Zero Force Evolutionary Law framework, introduced by Daniel McShea and Robert Brandon, and the statistical model selection framework first developed by Gene Hunt in the 2000s.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Library Eprints > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2023 06:25
Last Modified: 19 Sep 2023 06:25
URI: http://scholar.sdpublishers.info/id/eprint/2464

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item